Return to Main Registry

OPEN LETTER  BBC/EXT/041-0825

Date: 18 August 2025   |   Issued By: Central Classification Registry (Mandate I)   |   Distribution: Public Release

Subject: Request for Access and Classification of Arboreal Entities Referenced as “Tree of Life” and “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.”

To the Custodians of Doctrinal Authority across the Abrahamic Faiths,

The Bureau of Botanical Compliance has maintained a longstanding interest in two vegetal entities consistently cited in scriptural traditions: the so-called Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Despite their centrality within canonical accounts, these arboreal specimens remain absent from the Central Classification Registry. They are neither described in binomial terms, nor subjected to verifiable herbarium analysis. Their status, therefore, constitutes a breach of the Universal Classification and Labeling Mandate (BBC-001).

The Bureau respectfully requests the cooperation of your institutions in clarifying the following matters: the precise identification of both specimens; the conditions of their growth and reproduction; their fruit’s properties, whether nutritive, medicinal, or otherwise; and any restrictions that govern their accessibility. Such information is indispensable to the task of integrating these entities into the official botanical record.

We extend this inquiry not in opposition to faith, but in alignment with the universal principle that all vegetal matter—whether earthly or transcendent—must be properly named, ordered, and archived.

Respectfully,

Central Classification Registry (CCR)
Bureau of Botanical Compliance

Annex I — Instructions for Response

To ensure procedural clarity, responses to this memorandum should address the following points:

Consequences of Non-Compliance: Should no satisfactory response be received within the current fiscal cycle, both entities will be downgraded to “Metaphorical Vegetation — Category X”. Such a downgrade would remove them from active botanical registers and classify all subsequent references as symbolic rather than material evidence.